Big story, small story.

“So, what’s your story?”

“I was diagnosed when I was thirtee-“

“No, no your real story.”

“I am quite un-extraordinary.”

“I reject that out of hand.”

John Green’s novel “The Fault in Our Stars” is – so I am told – a moving and beautiful story. The above quote isn’t quite from the book: it’s from the movie trailer released a couple of weeks ago. Have a look here. I haven’t read it yet (it’s close to the top of my pile), so I  know only the broad sketches of the story, and in some sense it is uncomplicated: two teenagers, both suffering from cancer, fall in love. This interaction touches on a significant aspect of  The Fault in Our Stars: it engages with people and their stories beyond the obvious questions that everybody asks. Augustus, as he stares at Hazel and asks for her story, wants to know who she really is. He isn’t on about her disease, but about her.

photo (2)

As I have been writing about the importance of stories, I found this fascinating. Augustus here tells us something that the Christian would do well to heed – your story is important. Hazel’s cancer story is not her whole story. If stories are important in understanding and identity, then how our personal story fits in with the stories of other Christians is important. More fundamentally, what is the story of God? Our faith is built upon stories, and I would say it is impossible to be a Christian without some concept of the story of God and humanity. This works itself out in a few ways.

Continue reading


Yours Truly: MYC Musing #4

If you’ve been in the loop these last few days, I probably won’t be the first to tell you that Sydney has a new Anglican Archbishop. Dr Glenn Davies has been elected to serve the church (and the city) coming off the back of Peter Jensen’s 12 years. Predictably, he’s been getting the call-up of the media. Tonight, that meant appearing on ABC’s opinion show “The Drum”. Alongside expected discussion of his view of headship in marriage and church (which he handled graciously and clearly despite the usual scepticism), asylum seeker policy came up.

[A quick note: I know a lot of people are angered by the current policies and approaches regarding asylum seekers. This is also true for myself. This post doesn’t go into that, but I would recommend  the piece written by Julian Burnside in SMH (HERE)].

As he did in an interview a couple of days ago, Glenn Davies offered a different perspective. He didn’t outline policy specifics or make practical suggestions, but merely appealed for humane and compassionate treatment of asylum seekers, rather than debasement.

As he explained it, not only do we ship people around to various insufficient solutions, but we deny them a vital aspect of their humanity: work, opportunity for expression, creativity. People have very little, if anything to do. There is no meaningful occupation, no purpose.

This caused me to think back to Kamal’s first talk on MYC.  I’m going to walk through a few ideas that he talked about. Continue reading

Tolerance – MYC Musing #3

Lawrence Krauss is one of the biggest-name atheists out there, up with Dawkins and Hitchens. He’s of that school of thought branded “New Atheism”, which sets up science and faith against one another, and casts religious belief as both objectively and morally wrong.

In my opinion, there are a lot of holes, inconsistencies and problems with New Atheism. And there may be a post coming along those lines  – the initial draft of this blog turned much more in that direction than intended. If you want to look a little bit into the insufficiency of the New Atheism, look for books, debates etc by John Lennox.

Krauss is in Australia for several discussions about faith and science with William Lane Craig, who is out to be involved with the Your God mission. A quick plug: Lane Craig is speaking at Macquarie Uni on Monday (1pm, Drysdale Room), and several times at other campuses around Sydney. Google will help you out. See if you can get along to one of them.

Anyhow, we were talking at MYC about tolerance and love. Something that Krauss has said came to mind. He said that teaching creationism is child abuse, The episode of QandA with Krauss and Dickson featured some discussion around this point.

Continue reading

No Restraint – MYC Musing #2

What would you sacrifice for the king who died?

It’s so easy to be ashamed of our faith, or to want to conceal it. Maybe we want to share it, but we have boundaries: we will share it on these days, or with this person, or when we don’t have assignments to do. At MYC, the first talk was on the first half of Matthew 26. There are a bunch of things that I’m reflecting on, but one big one was this: how much do I value Jesus? When it comes down to it, value is worked out by how much you will sacrifice for something. It’s the principle behind any form of economy, or even any relationship. What you prioritise shows your values. What you trade in shows what you value.

When Jesus had finished all these sayings, he said to his disciples, 2 “You know that after two days the Passover is coming, and the Son of Man will be delivered up to be crucified.”

3 Then the chief priests and the elders of the people gathered in the palace of the high priest, whose name was Caiaphas, 4 and plotted together in order to arrest Jesus by stealth and kill him. 5 But they said, “Not during the feast, lest there be an uproar among the people.”

6 Now when Jesus was at Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, 7 a woman came up to him with an alabaster flask of very expensive ointment, and she poured it on his head as he reclined at table. 8 And when the disciples saw it, they were indignant, saying, “Why this waste?9 For this could have been sold for a large sum and given to the poor.”10 But Jesus, aware of this, said to them, “Why do you trouble the woman? For she has done a beautiful thing to me. 11 For you always have the poor with you, but you will not always have me. 12 In pouring this ointment on my body, she has done it to prepare me for burial. 13 Truly, I say to you, wherever this gospel is proclaimed in the whole world, what she has done will also be told in memory of her.”

14 Then one of the twelve, whose name was Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests 15 and said, “What will you give me if I deliver him over to you?” And they paid him thirty pieces of silver. 16 And from that moment he sought an opportunity to betray him.

17 Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Where will you have us prepare for you to eat the Passover?” 18 He said, “Go into the city to a certain man and say to him,‘The Teacher says, My time is at hand. I will keep the Passover at your house with my disciples.’” 19 And the disciples did as Jesus had directed them, and they prepared the Passover.

20 When it was evening, he reclined at table with the twelve. 21 And as they were eating, he said, “Truly, I say to you, one of you will betray me.”22 And they were very sorrowful and began to say to him one after another, “Is it I, Lord?” 23 He answered, “He who has dipped his hand in the dish with me will betray me. 24 The Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man if he had not been born.” 25 Judas, who would betray him, answered, “Is it I, Rabbi?” He said to him, “You have said so.”

When the woman comes up and pours the perfume out, she shocks the disciples, but gains the acclamation of Jesus. She gets that serving the poor is important, but honouring the King who became poor for our sake is our first priority. Her gesture is costly: Jesus is valuable to her, and she doesn’t let the scorn or rebuke of others hold her back.

The next scene, however, paints a stark contrast. Judas was the treasurer, and it seems to be him who objects to the “wasted” money (see John 12 – it may well be the same incident). He seeks out the Jewish leaders, and strikes a deal to sell out Jesus. 30 pieces of silver. It’s not just significantly less than the woman’s perfume would cost, but a conceptually degrading amount: the amount paid for the death of a slave. What a contrast  to the royal  honour poured out by the woman!

Next is Jesus sharing a meal with his disciples once more. He drops a clanger: hey guys, one of you is going to betray me! To share a meal was a symbol of trust and fellowship.  Judas was right in with them, and his betrayal is big. Judas seems to be in it for what he could gain (see John 12 again: he’s a bit of a penny pincher), and he saw no gains in being the disciple of a dead man. Judas massively undervalues Jesus: he sells him short. His rebuke of the woman’s gesture toward Jesus is seen in light of his own cheap betrayal.

The dichotomy is not just in how they treat Jesus, but in the consequences of their attitude. The woman is to be remembered all around the world, as the gospel is preached. Jesus was true to his word on this. Judas, on the other hand: “woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man if he had not been born.”

Friends, there is much at stake in how we see Jesus. The one who celebrates Jesus is remembered and proclaimed. The one who undervalues Jesus faces an afterlife of of condemnation.

That’s a huge challenge. Jesus is a king who died: it could be easy to feel ashamed. Sitting in a philosophy or science class, do you feel that your faith is a bit of an embarrassment? It is super easy for us to feel frustrated about going to serve God instead of notching up a few more marks in that assignment, or earning some extra dollars. It’s certainly something that I have felt. Often we don’t want to speak up for Jesus, for fear of being tarred with the same brush.

I was really struck that when it comes to Jesus, the proper response has no restraint. Considerations that there is a limit to how much we will give are in line with Judas’ thinking. Will we give things up in thankful sacrifice, or draw the line where our celebration of Christ ends? In this chapter, the juxtaposition of Judas with the woman makes the right attitude clear. What seems like a waste to others (even other disciples!) is never wasted if it is honouring Jesus.

This is always true, but it is certainly an important thing to consider when approaching the Your God mission over the next few weeks. I can’t speak for what God will do through us. What I do know is that I’m going in (and I pray that you will too) with a mind to be like the woman, not like Judas. To have an attitude that if it means I have to give up everything along the way, then that’s what it takes. If doing mission costs me reputation, marks, money, energy, health, whatever, I’m praying that God will help me to make those sacrifices without qualms.

The king has died, and I want to serve our great God proudly, not with shame or restraint. I want to bring it all to the table, and not set limits on what I will give for his mission.

Mission Shy: MYC Musing #1

For the past 5 days, I’ve been on camp. It was the Mid-Year Conference for Mac Uni’s Christian Union. The topic was mission, and we focused on Matthew 26-28. It seems like a lot of people come away with a couple of really clear ideas that stuck in their head. My experience is the opposite: there’s far too much buzzing around my noggin to recall how it all fits together.

There are a few reasons for this: there was a lot of bible in there. It’s hard to keep track of what is where, who says what.  A second factor is that we tackled things expositively as Dan and Scott walked us through Matthew, and systematically with Kamal. Each speaker had a distinctly different style of delivery.

These things accounted for, there is a massive amount of material, encouragement and rebuke to churn through and meditate upon. Partly for the sake of sharing, and partly to help myself work through this, I’m going to be whacking some reflection blogs up in the next couple of weeks. Hopefully this will also help in getting in the right mindset for the Your God mission over the next few weeks. Continue reading


Have a watch of this video. It’s awesome.

I don’t know what he is saying, but he’s just so stoked. His name is Aleksander Gamme, and he’s [i.e. was] down in Antarctica, on a south pole expedition. He’s left food caches along the way, but not recorded what is in each. To come across some trashy, tasty food after 86 days of healthy stuff just makes him lose it. So much stoke.

The reason I blogged it is this: It just made me stoked as well. That’s the premise behind this whole post. If it doesn’t have the same effect on others, then I’m a whacko and the following is pretty baseless. Anyhow, I’ve chucked together a few disparate musings. Hopefully it will give you some thoughts to chew on. Proceed. Continue reading

So God made a farmer



So God made a farmer.

There’s something about this ad that is just beautiful. It’s so simple. Old-school voice-over with awesome pictures beneath. The audio is from 1978 – Paul Harvey, an American radio presenter, delivered a speech at a farming convention.

One of the reasons it is so powerful is that it inspires. It inspires to see hard work as honourable and admirable. It makes you want to stop fooling around and just do it. Integrity, dedication, love and care are all showcased here. It’s humbling. And I have found it a challenge to me in my faith. We are to work hard, to keep going, to show endurance. We should show determination, courage and integrity, yet be tender and nurturing. We aren’t to give up, or have time off from serving God. We are to just do it. God’s work is better than farming. We should work harder and longer, be more invested, give our lives to this work more than any farmer.

And when I have a son, I hope that he can see a life of hard work and service. I pray that he will look up to me, and not see the job as something too rough or tough or draining. I pray that he will want to do what I have done, because that is the best thing in the world to do.